Re: Setting mnigame max bets? [message #57128 is a reply to message #57126] |
Wed, 05 May 2010 21:25   |
Synte
Messages: 29 Registered: April 2010
|
|
|
|
jwc2200 wrote on Wed, 05 May 2010 19:12 | ... Higher bets are surely not the easiest way to get more gold, but I would like to see the option made available in the future, just for fun.
|
LOl, the idea is a way to waste gold. The easiest way by far to 'earn' gold is the exploit to buy/sell gifts back to the same idiot vendors over and over again in bulk (not to mention this gives you a ton of skill exp), hmm maybe i should try to fix that exploit and make the game harder. xD
Anyhow yea I saw all the references to each game but couldn't open in FE, thanks John for the explanation why, and both of you for the replies in general, just seemed annoying to me that I couldn't find a single value to change (the 1000).
jwc2200 wrote on Tue, 04 May 2010 19:31 | I looked into this in the past, but CBettingDef concerns the Temple of Avo only it seems.
I just looked at it deeper and found that there are 52 viable shopkeepers in the CShopDef, but there are only 40 shops and wandering traders by my count, not including game keepers. I will work on the others soon to try to first figure out which ones are game keepers, and then, hopefully, what controls betting.
If you want to start on that yourself, the ones that are unidentified are:
8896
8898
93580- may be a female tailor for Bower Stone that isn't used.
9633
9634
9635
10763
11292
11390
8895 is a NULDEF it looks like
|
Do you really think the game might consider a minigame npc a shop? seems sort of odd if that is in fact where it's hiding. I'll have a look at them.
EDIT:
JohnDoe wrote on Wed, 05 May 2010 06:28 | The game was probably meant to use the CBettingDef entries for the pub games at one time or another, but it seems that only the Avo temple donating thing uses it. Maybe. Not sure on that. ...
|
Yea it is temple of avo only, thats the first thing I tried changing, it had no effect on the pub games.
-Syn
[Updated on: Wed, 05 May 2010 21:36] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|